Whether It Is A Debate Or a A Shoutfest Is A Cruel {unishment To Pinoys

Move over, Netflix. Step aside, TikTok. 

The hottest ticket in town was almost—almost—the intellectual cage match of the century: The Legal Titans vs. The King of Alternative Sovereignty."

But just as we were popping our popcorn, Senator Ping Lacson stepped in like a weary parent at a chaotic birthday party to deliver a sobering message: :"Please do not do this for the love of our collective blood pressure."

Senator Lacson’s appeal to Justice Antonio Carpio and Atty. Jay Batongbacal is essentially an act of humanitarian aid. 

He isn't worried about who would win the debate—that would be like worrying if a literal shark would beat a rubber duck in a swimming race.

No, Ping is worried about the "agony" of the Filipino people.

He knows that watching a Supreme Court Justice explain international law to someone who views the West Philippine Sea as a "negotiable garage" is a form of psychological warfare. 

Why a Debate is Actually a "Health Hazard":

• Risk of Spontaneous Combustion: Experts believe the human brain can only handle a certain amount of "logical gymnastics" before it simply shuts down to protect itself.

• The Confusion Coefficient: For every five minutes of a Marcoleta speech, three Filipinos accidentally forget their own middle names, and two start wondering if they actually need a visa to visit their own kitchen.

• The Agony Factor: Listening to a debate where one side uses the UNCLOS and the other uses "Vibes and Surrender" is not education—it’s a migraine with subtitles.

Senator Lacson’s warning about questioning the "basic right of abode" is a polite way of saying: "Let’s not have a televised event where we debate whether or not our own citizens are technically squatting on their own islands."

It’s a bold strategic move to debate if your house is yours while the neighbor is already installing a new lock on your front door. 

Lacson is suggesting that perhaps—just perhaps—we should stop talking about the "if" and start focusing on the "get the hell out of my yard." 

---

The Lacson Doctrine: "Don't Feed the Trolls (Even the Ones in Suits)"

The Contestant	Weapon of Choice	Strategy
Justice Carpio	The 2016 Arbitral Ruling	Using actual facts and international precedents.
Atty. Batongbacal	Maritime Law Expertise	Defending the EEZ with logic and academic rigor.
Sen. Marcoleta	"Rhetorical Parkour"	Suggesting we leave the islands because they’re "too far" or "too controversial."
The Filipino Public	A remote control	Trying to find a channel that isn't debating our own existence.

Senator Lacson has effectively invoked the "Pointless Debate Clause" of the Philippine Constitution (which doesn't exist, but should). 

He knows that in a battle between a lighthouse and a fog machine, the only thing the public gets is a loss of vision.

By urging Carpio and Batongbacal to stay home, Ping is essentially saying: "Gentlemen, you have already won the argument. 

Please don't lower yourselves to a debate where the moderator has to remind the opponent that 'Giving up' is not a synonym for 'Winning'."

Let us instead focus on "concrete steps"—like making sure our boats have enough gas to outrun the diplomats who are trying to talk them into sinking themselves.