The battle between Nawat Itsagrisil and Andre Sleigh is raging. And the battle between whose pageant is major and who is minor is adding more fuel to the fire.
The tit-for-tat between the two just shows they are not Big Four.
Look how quiet Miss Universe, MW, MI, and ME are, the CEO or founder won't stoop that low and engage. Andrei should not engage with a pageant or CEO (Nawat) who is fetching for validation. You just make them look important.
Do not get me wrong, I am pro-business and that just means the more pageant the better. The more opportunities to ladies and countries that profit from the pageant industry (e.g. USA, Philippines, Venezuela, Colombia, Puerto Rico, Mexico, etc). I can be critical to any of the Big 5 or any pageant if I see something that can still be fixed.
We should know by now that Miss Grand International Organization works in a way by making fire, starting one, and flaming it to the max. If you've been always saying Miss World is a cooking show, how come until today, as a pageant fan, as a collective, no one had been successful in stopping a candidate to join a pageant you call a cooking show. It's the same with Miss Grand International, they are fetching attention for years, don't give that power to them, blessed are those who wield moral ascendancy.
The best thing is not to engage, do the silent treatment like the other Big 5. The problem with most of us you still engage with people you hate, still visit and view their page, IG, FB, and Youtube, then you will be enraged by what you hear and see.
Please, the world needs to conserve energy, use that energy for something that will at least be used for good. In turn, if that energy is passed-off, it started from a good place and not from negativity. By engaging with people and pageant organizations you hate, you just validate their existence, and then the more they get famous or notorious, the more they profit, the more they get known.
****************************
GOOD ADVICE ... BUT IT IS EASIER SAID THAN DONE ... we promise one day that we will stop, only to find ourselves lured back to Nawat's lap. Or was it Nawat's trap?
Can online fans quit Nawat? Why is it hard for them to quit Nawat? Why does their Nawat's obsession relapse when they try to quit? Do Nawat's addicted smokers unable to thwart the irresistible cravings of Nawat? Why would they follow/react to Nawat's inane provocations knowing it can put them in a state of disequilibrium? The evidence reviewed here seems most consistent with the view that Nawat's sycophants retain control over their actions but cannot easily stop having frequent desires to get a dose of Nawat.
Nawat is addictive. The core issue here is voluntary control of behavior: Do Nawat puffers lose voluntary control of their behavior insofar as they become addicted? Or do they remain responsible and in control, simply choosing to pursue the pleasures and satisfactions associated with Nawat?
Nawat has already toasted us, I included. I already promised myself that I will ignore him and stay away from him for good but here I am making a thread for him.
No comments:
Post a Comment