Visual Gaslighting

Visual Gaslighting

"We are living in the world of oddballs".

Our society now is increasingly embracing situations or individuals who are peculiar, eccentric, and anyone can just tailor a script from heaven knows where and make it a gospel truth.

It suggests a shift away from strict conformity, highlighting a world where the unique, bizarre, or untraditional behaviors and ideas are increasingly accepted and tolerated.

In the DDS multiverse ... for instance, in VP Sara's impeachment hearing ... anything that will help the cause ... bahala na kung makakatulong talaga or hindi.

After Ramil Madriaga was introduced via the House of Representatives impeachment process, there was no letup; everyone from the aggrieved camp wanted to question his credibility and pin him down - that he was not credible, for crying out loud.

Remember Paolo Marcoleta… after his HOR colleagues struck out everything he said from the record … that Madriaga was not credible ... nakita pa siyang lumapit kay Ramil Madriaga, kung ano ang pumasok sa isip niya at pinaplano niya, siya lang ang nakaalam.

Mabuti na lang, inilayo na siya ng mga NBI at baka ano pang isip batang laro in the likes of Barzuela and Leviste ang kanyang gagawin. Well ... enough of him.

Well, what do you know? The latest "scandal" threatening to bring down the house isn't about the ₱805 billion or the mysterious "Mary Grace Piattos."

No, we are currently locked in a life-or-death struggle over the tale of Two Senoritas.

Duterte defenders have pounced on a painting behind the Vice President, screaming "Liar!" at Ramil Madriaga because Davao artist Tanya Gaisano Lee claimed the artwork as hers.

It was the perfect "Gotcha" moment—if you happen to be legally blind.

The satire here is that the "investigative experts" on social media have apparently skipped the part of their kindergarten where you learn to "Spot the Difference."

In one corner: Tanya’s work—tight, geometric, intricate, and very "Davao Chic."

In the other corner: The scholar’s painting—broader patterns, different hair rendering, and a sleeve design that wouldn't even pass as a knock-off at a night market.

To call these the same painting is like looking at a poodle and a wolf and saying, "Look, they both have four legs and fur, so the wolf must be a deep-fake poodle!"

When a photo surfaced of Madriaga’s scholar actually holding her version of the painting, the Dutertes' narrative didn't just leak—it capsized.

It turns out Madriaga didn't hallucinate a scholar in Laguna; he just happened to commission a painting of a woman in a baro't saya, which—shocker!—is a popular subject in Filipino art.

But in the world of Narrative Sabotage, facts are just annoying speed bumps.

The goal wasn't to be accurate; it was to be viral. So these what we are going to do.

-Find an image that looks vaguely similar.

-Ignore the textile patterns and brushstrokes.

-Scream "FALSE!" until the algorithm picks it up.

Let’s be honest: reading a sworn affidavit line-by-line is hard. It requires brain cells, patience, and a lack of bias.

But getting angry at a painting? That’s easy! That’s a snackable, 15-second "Fact Check" that you can consume while waiting for your Starbucks.

The defenders latched onto the painting because it was a Visual Smear Campaign.

They hoped that by proving Madriaga "lied" about a piece of wall decor, the public would assume he also lied about the bagman duties, the confidential funds, and everything else.

It’s the "Small Crack" theory: if you can't find a hole in the ship, just draw one with a Sharpie and tell everyone to start bailing water.

The real comedy here isn't that Madriaga might have a different taste in art; it’s that the people accusing him of deception are the ones using the wrong painting to "prove" his dishonesty.

It’s like a prosecutor trying to convict a man of stealing a car by showing the jury a picture of a bicycle.

If the paintings are different—and even a casual glance at the torso composition says they are—then the "scandal" isn't Madriaga's credibility.

The scandal is the Intellectual Dishonesty of the people who tried to frame a false contradiction.

In 2026, being a witness in an impeachment hearing means you don't just need a lawyer; you need an Art Historian.

The Duterte camp’s desperation is showing. When you have to resort to "Pattern Analysis" and "Sleeve Comparison" to discredit a witness because his actual testimony is too uncomfortable to face, you aren't looking for the truth—you’re just looking for a better scriptwriter.

The Moral of the Story: Before you try to assassinate someone’s character using a painting, make sure you aren't holding the wrong canvas.

Otherwise, the only person you’re painting as a liar is yourself.

Comparing Madriaga With Guteza and the 18 Marines: The Natural and The Rehearsed

A survey in Facebook was asking Kung Maniniwala Ba Tayo kay Madriaga? Or kay Goteza or sa 18 Marines?

Look no further ... unreliable as they may be ... but the people have spoken and they overwhelmingly believe Ramil Madriaga over the two.

In the grand arena of the House of Representatives, where the "truth" is often whatever you can shout the loudest, a new folk hero has emerged. 

His name is Ramil Madriaga, and he has achieved something almost impossible in 2026: he has convinced the internet that he isn’t reading from a teleprompter.

While the "18 Marines" (some of whom weren't actually Marines) and the elusive Goteza performed like high school students in a mandatory play they didn't rehearse for,

Madriaga walked in and delivered his testimony with the smooth, caffeinated energy of a man who actually remembers what he saw.

In the impeachment hearing, Paolo Marcoleta—attempted to play the "Prisoner Card" to smear on Madriaga’s credibility ... as prisoners are often viewed through the lens of their crime and whatever statements they make become untruthful testimony.

But Rep. Luistro was quick with the legal "slap-down," reminding everyone that being physically incarcerated does not mean you have been legally found guilty, sentenced, and convicted.

In the Philippines, "innocent until proven guilty" is still technically on the books, even if some people treat it like a "Terms and Conditions" box they just scroll past.

The netizens have spoken, and the "Vibe Check" and random survey results are in:

• The Madriaga Method: Fast, continuous, and zero hesitation. He’s like a human firehose of information.

• The Goteza/Marine Method: Long pauses, checking with lawyers, and looking at Rep. Rodante Marcoleta for "spiritual guidance" on how to finish a sentence.

As one netizen pointed out, Goteza looked like he was being "coached" mid-stream, which is a big no-no in the world of professional lying. 

If you're going to mislead the public, you have to at least learn your lines! The "18 Marines" script was so obvious it might as well have come with a "Property of the OVP" watermark.

But the real juice of this satire is the Betrayal Arc. Ramil Madriaga isn't just a witness; he’s the "Loyal Friend" who got ghosted.

For years, Madriaga was the silent vault of Duterte's secrets. 

He did the dirty work, he held the bag, and he kept his mouth shut—even when the threats started rolling in. 

He considered them friends. He stayed silent because of "loyalty," which in Davao politics is usually worth its weight in confidential funds.

But then, the ultimate "EFF UP" happened. The powers-that-be decided to pick Harry Roque over him. 

Imagine being a loyal foot soldier for years, only to be replaced by a man whose primary skill is dancing on TikTok and avoiding the NBI. 

That’s not just a betrayal; that’s an insult to the profession of secret-keeping.

The silent treatment ended the moment the plotters committed the cardinal sin of the underworld: They went after his family. 

You can threaten a man’s life, and he might stay quiet. You can deny him a promotion, and he might just pout. But you mess with the family? That’s how you turn a "Secret-Keeper" into a "Bestselling Author of Truth." 

Madriaga realized the only way to keep his family safe was to spill the beans so thoroughly that there wouldn't be any beans left in the jar.

The OVP and the Marcoleta camp are currently facing a "Creative Crisis." 

Their previous witnesses were so rehearsed they became parodies, while their "betrayed" former ally is now singing like a bird with an unlimited data plan.

When a witness answers questions without looking at a lawyer every five seconds, the people notice. 

When a witness knows "too much" and has a grudge, the Senate should probably order more popcorn.

The Moral of the Story: If you’re going to have 805 billion pesos worth of secrets, maybe don't trade your most loyal witness for a TikTok star. It really ruins the "Fast-Break" to the 2028 finish line.

Paolo Marcoleta: He wants Attention ... He Get It 100 Percent

In the revered halls of the House of Representatives (where you found a profound sense of awe), the impeachment hearing of Vice President Sara Duterte has officially pivoted a 180-degree turn - the eerie feeling of deep reverence and respect has changed in an instant, disintegrating into a "putso putso" variety show.

I couldn't imagine how the HOR bigwigs have prepared for this big event after being pooh-poohed last year for lack of due process and encroaching on 1 year bar rule.

I also could not understand the mechanics of how Cong Luistro stomached accepting this damned if you do .... damned if you don't job)

For sure, she is losing her sanity in the process, as she meticulously follows the Supreme Court's major suggestions to the letter on how to do the ABC of impeachment proceedings.

They can't afford a repeat of last year's debacle, and getting a stamp of approval from SC is all they need.

So they have to do well, keeping in mind that they have to adhere to and execute their guidelines.

I almost lost count of how many times the Justice Committee was frantically trying to reach the VP and also the Office Of The Vice President, and presumably getting nothing but a voicemail recording of someone crunching on Mary Grace Piattos.

The real "pasavogue," however, was not what we discussed in our intro.

It was provided by the man, the myth, the uninvited guest: Rep. Paolo Marcoleta.

Some netizens are beginning to wonder because of their strong resemblance and demeanor, they asked:" Was he the son of Rodante Marcoleta? "

Did you see how audacious and sanctimonious ... he was?

Marcoleta has pioneered a new legislative hobby: Procedural Party Crashing.

Not being a member of the committee, he possesses a supernatural ability to materialize whenever a microphone is live and a debate is brewing. He has perfect timing, too.

Netizens are split on his motivation:
The "Loyalist" Theory: He’s doing it for Sara.

The "Main Character" Theory: He’s doing it for himself.

Like a legislative version of a "chip off the old block" (shoutout to the Barzagas and Levistes of the world), Marcoleta has decided that when the rest of the room is wearing yellow, he’s going to wear neon plaid—just to be different.

He claims he’s doing it for "The Filipino People," but at this point, the Filipino people are mostly getting tired of his father's antics, having two Marcoletas in the Senate, and the HOR is a hard pill to swallow.

His performance today was cringeworthy, causing acute embarrassment and awkwardness even from the most jaded netizen.

Marcoleta unleashed a flurry of "arguments" so baffling that one of his colleagues eventually had to perform a legal mercy killing, moving to have everything he said stricken from the record.

When faced with the prospect of his words being erased from history, Marcoleta—ever the comedian—quipped: "Baka wala nang matira?" (Maybe nothing will be left?)

Give the man a trophy for honesty! It was a moment of rare self-awareness.

If you strike out the grandstanding, the interruptions, and the "main character" monologues, the transcript of his contribution would indeed be very clean and very empty.

The father-and-son tag team is a tragicomedy.

Rodante Marcoleta was once known as a "de campanilla" lawyer, a man whose baritone voice could command a room.

But somewhere between the ABS-CBN shutdown and the "Piattos" defense, the father chose a different career path: Professional Caricature.

Now the son is following his footsteps like they were Siamese twins.

In Paolo's experience yesterday ... he doesn't mind being the laughingstock as long as he’s the center of the laughter.

The Goal: 100% attention.

The Result: 100% achieved.

The Cost: A reputation that is now less "No-Nonsense Congressman" and more "Court Jester of the Lower House."

He kept on saying he was just manifesting and reacting to what he had heard. But who believes him?

He was reading his reactions - in other words, those reactions have long been done ... even before the hearing started. One netizen jokes ... his reactions were done by the father.

Despite several congressmen arguing with him—essentially trying to tell him that he doesn't even work here (in this committee)—Marcoleta remained unstoppable.

He is the legislative equivalent of that one uncle at the wedding who wasn't invited to the speech portion but somehow ends up with the microphone and a 20-minute story about his gallbladder surgery.

As the impeachment moves forward toward its April 14 climax, one thing is certain: the "Piattos" might be fictitious, the "Marines" might be AWOL, but Marcoleta’s need for the spotlight is the most verifiable fact in the building.

In the House of Representatives, you can be a lawmaker, or you can be a meme.

Marcoleta has made his choice, and unfortunately for the record-keepers, there isn't enough "white-out" in the world to keep up with him.

Senator Bong Go: Pa Victim

While 'normalcy' remains elusive for many, Senator Bong Go claims to have unlocked the path to a renewed comeback for national recovery.

What we experience right now ... he likened it to a long, painful commercial break, just waiting for the 'Duterte 2' sequel to hit the marquee ... starring, of course, VP Sara.

Here is a look at the "Normal Life" we are all supposedly missing so much.

1. The "Back to Normal" Starter Pack
According to the Gospel of Bong Go, "Normal" isn't a state of mind.

Once VP Sara takes the helm, the following "normal" occurrences will miraculously return:

The Great Homecoming: Harry Roque can finally stop his world tour of "Not-a-Fugitive" hideouts and come home to a red carpet.

The Guest List: Michael Yang returns as the Economic Adviser, because nothing says "National Interest" like a guy who treated the Pharmally funds like a personal piggy bank.

The Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free Cards: Gerald Bantag and Alice Guo (if she’s still around) can finally breathe that sweet, unfiltered air of "Absolution."

The Entertainment Sector: E-Sabong and POGOs will rise like a phoenix from the ashes, ensuring that every Filipino has the constitutional right to lose their life savings from the comfort of their smartphone.

2. "We" vs. "They."
The most hilarious part of the Senator’s sentiment is the use of the word "TAYO" (Us) masquerading as a facade for KAMI (the special WE group). See the difference between TAYO and KAMI?

For the Rest of Us
-Normal means lower rice prices and translatable jeepney routes.
-Normal means having to eat three times a day and a roof over our head.
-Normal means being able to go out at night without fear of being mugged.

For their "Circle of Friends"
-Normal means having a direct line to the Malacañang kitchen.
-Normal means the ICC being treated like a spam caller.
-Normal means "Confidential Funds" appearing like magic tricks.

Let’s be real: when Bong Go says "we" can go back to normal, he’s talking about that very specific group of people who currently feel like they’re living in an alternate reality where they actually have to follow rules.

"It’s not a national crisis, Senator; it’s just a lifestyle change.

You’re not a victim of 'abnormal times'; you’re just experiencing the tragic side effect of an expired 'unlimited power' subscription."

Senator, we appreciate the concern for our "normalcy."

But for most Filipinos, your "Normal" looks suspiciously like a high-budget sequel to a movie we already walked out of.

If "Normal" means the return of Ghost Projects and the absolution of every "Biscaya" couple in the archipelago, maybe we’re actually quite happy being a little "abnormal" for a while.

After all, the only thing "Normal" about that plan is the audacity.

The Doubting Thomases in the Current Political Climate

It’s ironic, isn’t it? In the Gospel, Thomas said: “Unless I see in his hands the mark of the nails, and place my hand into his side, I will never believe” (John 20:25).

In Philippine politics, we have the opposite scenario: we see the "wounds" (the floods, the empty coffers, the broken roads) every single day, yet we are asked to believe that the government has done a sterling job in governance.

Here is a satirical take on our modern-day "Douthing Thomases" navigating the stormy waters of 2026 politics.

1. The Miracle of the Invisible Flood Control
In the Philippines, we don't have Doubting Thomases; we have Drowning Thomases.

As the 2026 monsoon turns Manila into a world-class water park, the government points to the ₱500 billion state-of-the-art project.

The Drowning Thomas stands on his roof, waist-deep in murky water, looking at a DPWH sign that says "Flood Control Project: 98% Complete."

The Parallel: Just as Thomas needed to put his finger into the nail marks, the Filipino taxpayer wants to put his finger on an actual, functioning pumping station.

The Satire: The government’s response? "Blessed are those who have not seen the flood control gates, yet believe they are working." If you can’t see the project, it’s not because it’s a "ghost project"—it’s just underwater. It’s a matter of faith, Thomas!

2. The Impeachment: "I Will Not Believe Until I See the Receipts."

Then we have the Senate Doubting Thomases regarding the impeachment of VP Sara.

While the House of Representatives has presented alleged evidence regarding the misuse of confidential funds, including transported bags of cash, certain Senators are playing the role of the doubting Thams perfectly."

The Parallel: Thomas said, "Unless I see the print of the nails... I will not believe."

The Satire: A Senator looks at a mountain of COA disallowances and says, "Unless I personally count the ₱125 million in 11 days myself, I shall remain unconvinced."

In this version, even if be someone's"Truth" stands right in front of them, they’ll ask for a Notarized Affidavit from the Truth first—preferably one that doesn't affect their 2028 coalition prospects.

3. The "Stigma" of the Secret Wealth
Remember that "fake news" about you having money? In politics, it’s the reverse. We see politicians who officially own nothing but a "modest" hut and a 1990s sedan in their SALN, yet they live in mansions with gold-plated faucets.

The Parallel: Thomas doubted the divinity of a man who looked human. We doubt the "poverty" of men who look like billionaires.

The Satire: We are the Doubting Thomases when a politician says, "I am as poor as a church mouse." We want to see the wounds—specifically, the wounds in their bank accounts.

But instead of showing us the "holes," they show us "Non-Disclosure Agreements" and "Confidential Fund" loopholes.

In the Bible, Thomas’s doubt was cured by a Physical Encounter with the truth. In the Philippines, our doubt is permanent because the "Truth" is usually:

Under a non-disclosure agreement.

Hidden in a "confidential fund."

Or washed away by a ₱5-billion flood control project that turned out to be made of sand and recycled campaign posters.

Keep clapping for your blind idolatry that your idol can't be someone's gift from heaven!

It’s fitting, really—in a land of invisible infrastructure, holding onto a fake reality is the only thing that makes sense.

Where's Waldo ... Where's Is BBM?

It looked like Where's Waldo, The Pinoy Version had its comeback, and people had just that insatiable desire to ask: Is the President still alive?

 We have entered a fascinating era of "Selective Observation," where the rules of physics depend entirely on your political affiliation.

The DDS internet detectives are currently in a frenzy, scouring the earth for President Bongbong Marcos. 

The government releases a video of him in Bataan? "Edited!" say the vloggers. 

He appears at a televised event? "Deepfake!" scream the commenters. Has he been seen working by the mainstream media? "Mainstream lies!" they chant.

Apparently, for some, the President is like a ghost—even when he’s standing right in front of you, you need a paranormal investigator to confirm he’s not just a high-resolution projection from Malacanang.

But here’s the satirical twist: while everyone is hyper-fixated on BBM’s pulse, we seem to have a growing list of "Missing Persons" that nobody in the vlogger-verse seems to care about.

• Senator Bato Dela Rosa: Is he still among us? He’s been MIA longer than a summer vacation. He’s practically achieved a state of legislative Nirvana—existing only in the abstract, far away from the Senate floor or a timecard. Why aren't we checking his pulse?

• Gerald Bantag: Last seen... somewhere?

• Atong Ang: The man is like a mythic creature; everyone talks about him, but sightings are rarer than a sincere political apology.

• Harry Roque: Now, if we’re talking about AI, let’s look here. Every time a "regular" post appears from the former spokesperson, one has to wonder: Is that really Harry, or is it a sophisticated "Spokes-Bot" programmed to maximize sass and minimize accountability? 

• 
  

So, why the obsession with proving the President is incapacitated? Why the desperate need to find a "flatline" in every video clip?

The goal isn't "concern for the leader’s health.

" It’s a Senatorial Fast-Break. They aren't looking for a pulse; they’re looking for a vacancy. 

It’s the dream of the "Instant Presidency"—the political equivalent of a "Skip to the End" button on a long YouTube video. 

Why wait for the pesky 2028 elections when you can just "narrate" the current occupant out of the office and slide the Vice President into the big chair by Monday morning? It is truly impressive to watch the logic at play:

1. Marcos is seen working: "Fake news! He's dying!"

2. Dela Rosa is literally never seen: "He's just busy being a patriot! Leave him alone!"

3. Roque posts from an undisclosed location: "He's a hero!"

In the world of "Didilis" logic, being AWOL is a sign of strength, but being Visible is a sign of a deep-fake conspiracy.

 It’s a state-of-the-art innovation in mental gymnastics that would win a gold medal if "Delusion" were an Olympic sport.

The President is out there working, documented by every legitimate news outlet in the country. 

Meanwhile, a handfulof high-ranking officials have pulled a "Houdini" and  vanished from public view, yet the vloggers are silent.

Perhaps it’s time to stop checking the President’s temperature and start checking the Senatorial attendance sheet. 

But then again, a "Fast-Break" to 2028 is much more exciting than a boring old thing like "facts" or "constitutional procedure."

The Fake News That Put A Smile On My Face

Dapat magalit tayo sa mga fake news. Pero may isang fake news about me na labis kong ikinatuwa. Hindi lang happy ha ... pumapalakpak pa ang tenga ko.Yung fake news na sinasabi nilang… may pera daw ako.Minsan talaga, ang sarap yakapin ang maling impormasyon, lalo na kung ang alternatibo ay ang masakit na katotohanan ng bank account natin. May mga "fake news" talaga na masarap pakinggan, parang musika sa tenga—kahit na ang tanging laman ng bulsa natin ay resibo at pag-asa.

Sabi nga nila, "Claim it!" Baka naman hindi 'yan fake news, kundi "advanced news" lang na hindi pa nadedeliver ng tadhana.

Narito ang ilang dahilan kung bakit nakaka-good vibes ang ganyang klaseng tsismis:

• Manifestation by Proxy: Kapag iniisip ng mga tao na mayaman ka, feeling mo rin tuloy, kahit sandali, ay bahagi ka ng 1%. Libreng pangarap, ika nga.

• The "Rich" Aesthetic: Ibig sabihin, maganda ang dalhin mo sa sarili. Kung mukha kang "may pera" sa mata nila kahit wala, tagumpay ang iyong skin care o ang husay mong magdala ng damit.

• Credit Score ng Tsismis: Mas okay na mapagkamalang milyonaryo kaysa mapagkamalang nangungutang. At least, mataas ang "social credit" mo sa barangay.

Sa mundong sosyal media na puno ng bardagulan at negatibiti, 'yung mapagkamalan kang mapera ang pinaka-harmless at nakaka-flatter na "fake news." Sige lang, hayaan mo silang pumalakpak; basta ang mahalaga, hindi sila hihiram sa 'yo!

Anong plano natin sa "fictional wealth" na 'yan—ipapa-renovate na ba natin ang gate o magpapa-catering na sa susunod na kanto?