Blog Invitation

Blog Invitation

Register -Become a Follower

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Satire: Did INC Have Permit?



Welcome to the newest episode of Philippine Legal Physics, where the laws of the land operate entirely on a slider scale based on how many buses you can lease before dawn.

Today, Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA) experienced a complete reality breakdown.

Ordinary Filipinos know the drill: if you so much as stop your car on the EDSA yellow lane to pick up a text message, an MMDA officer will appear out of nowhere like an angry anime character to fine you.

If a small student group tries to hold a peaceful rally with cardboard signs, they are instantly met with anti-riot shields, water cannons, and a lecture on Batas Pambansa Blg. 880.

But on this spectacular Tuesday morning, 10,000 members of a highly disciplined organization magically bypassed the entire legal framework.

No coordination. No advisory. No permit. Just pure, unadulterated "surprise" choreography.

Let’s look at the satire, the reality, and the legal gymnastics of how this went down.

Is the Iglesia Ni Cristo a Special Group of People, and is the Government Afraid to touch them with a 10-foot pole?

To answer the question: Yes, and yes. (It is just how we feel.)

In the Philippines, there are two types of citizens subject to the Public Assembly Act:

Normal Citizens: Bound by the laws of physics, the local government, and the PNP. They need permits.

The Bloc-Voting Elite: Blessed with the divine right to create spontaneous gridlock.

When the MMDA and the Quezon City government woke up at 3:00 a.m. to find White Plains Avenue completely shut down and buses blocking the EDSA Carousel busway, their response wasn't a swift enforcement of the "No Permit, No Rally" policy.

Instead, they activated the highest tier of government strategy: Extremely Maximum Tolerance. Which is almost a cliché to us.

While daily wage earners were stranded in traffic, losing their daily pay, officials pleaded on the radio for the rallyists to "please respect other people's rights."

It turns out, when you possess a unified voting base that politicians rely on to get elected every three years, "illegal assembly" is reclassified as a "spontaneous festival of expression."

The government isn’t just afraid of them; they are actively auditioning for their future endorsement.

Can They Be Sued? Technically, yes. In a parallel universe where the law is blind and un-sentimental, the organizers and participants could face a mountain of legal trouble.
If a brave soul actually decided to file a case, they could do so on several distinct grounds:

1. -Legal Ground/Law - Batas Pambansa Blg. 880 (Public Assembly Act)

-What It Covers - Section 13 penalizes holding a public assembly without a written permit, carrying a penalty of imprisonment.

-The Irony - The law explicitly states the rally is illegal, but police spent the morning negotiating with organizers rather than serving citations.

2. -Legal Ground / Law - Article 351 of the Revised Penal Code (Grave Public Nuisance)

-What It Covers - Any act that annoys, offends the senses, obstructs, or interferes with the free passage of any public highway.

-The Irony - Shutting down the EDSA Ortigas Flyover on a Tuesday morning is the literal textbook definition of a public nuisance.

3. -Legal Ground/Law - Article 2176 of the Civil Code (Quasi-Delict / Torts)

-What It Covers - Suing for actual financial damages caused by negligence or intentional disruption.

-The Irony - Thousands of daily wage earners lost their hourly pay today because they couldn't get to work. Millions of pesos in economic productivity vanished in the Ortigas split.

4. - Legal Ground/ Law - Land Transportation Rules

-What It Covers - Illegal parking, blocking the EDSA busway, and obstruction of traffic by the transport buses.

-The Irony - One bus driver was almost arrested, leading to a scuffle where protesters chanted "We are one," effectively using collective unity as a shield against a traffic violation.

Ultimately, today's EDSA event successfully updated the legal precedent for protests in the Philippines. Moving forward, the rule of law has been simplified into a handy mathematical equation:

Severity of the Violation
Legal Liability = ------------------------------------
Number of Voters in Your Congregation

If the number on the bottom is large enough, the legal liability drops to zero, traffic laws become mere suggestions, and the highway becomes your stage.

So, to all the commuters who were late, docked of pay, or stranded in the heat: just remember, your constitutional right to travel is incredibly important—it’s just slightly less important than a politician's need to stay on the good side of a non-bailable plunder defendant’s support group.

(Just In Report: Nakakuha na raw ang INC ng permit.) The question remains ... di ba dapat sa simula pa lang ng rally nandiyan na ang permit ... hindi yong pinahabol na lang?)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Flag Counter

free counters

Be A Follower

Be A Follower

Blog Of The Week

Blog Of The Week

Blog of The Week

Blog of The Week

Revolver Map

Powered By Blogger

Search This Blog

Visitors Stats Today

  • …

    Posts
  • …

    Comments
  • …

    Pageviews

Today Is

Calendar Widget by CalendarLabs

World Time

About Me

Wretired writer, Malayang Free Thinker, Probing Blogger, Disenteng Dissenter, Tempered temperamental, Liberal-Conservative, Grammar and Syntax Police, Pageant Connoisseur, Hibiscus Collector

Back To Top

”go"

Labels

Then and Now: The Tale of Two Marcoletas

It is a scientific fact that the human body cannot perform a true 360-degree turn without ending up exactly where it started.  But in the ma...

Popular Posts