I was laughing at the review of Christian Esguerra about the political sound-byte issued by the Vice President. Being a professor himself Christian finds it hard to see LOGIC in her statement. He further said "Kahit sa syllogism parang mahirap pumasa ..."
What are syllogisms by the way? A syllogism is a form of logical reasoning where the conclusion is gotten from two given premises and propositions ... each of which shares a term with the conclusion ... and the middle term is not present in the conclusion. (for example .. all lawyers are politicians (well ... not all) ... all politicians are good speakers (not all) ... therefore all lawyers are good speakers. (Well ... not all).
Di ba dapat para pumasa sa mataas na standard ni Christian Esguerra ito dapat ang linyahan? "Kung sino ang kumokontra sa confidential funds ay kumokontra sa kapayapaan. Kung sino ang kumokontra sa kapayapaan ay members of the House of Representatives ... therefore kung sino ang kumokontra sa confidential funds ay mga members ng House of Representatives.
The given premises and proposition share a term in the conclusion ... and the middle term is not present in the conclusion. Nakita ninyo?
No comments:
Post a Comment