Netizen's Comment: A pageant blog has bannered breaking news that the owner of Miss Gr@nd International Nawat Itsaragrisil is in the Philippines and met Architect Richelle Singson Michael of Miss Universe Philippines, LCS Group Vice Chairman.
Then he was seen in Binibining Pilipinas doing chummy chummy with Herlene "Hipon Girl" Budol and Eiffel Rosalita of Catanduanes.
The following day he was with Arnold Vegafria, the owner of Miss World Philippines.
What on earth is Nawat up to this time? Does Nawat consult with his team and staff about his unpredictable moves or he is going solo?
Tough decisions and unpopular moves need not be made alone. But Nawat always wants to go solo although he has sporadic support from his organization and previous winners ... that wasn't enough. I think he does make decisions impulsively without thinking of the rationality of his actions, like comparing his organization with the much-established ones like Miss Universe or dragging himself into a word war with Miss Earth, when the latter was reticent to fire back the same ammunition, or self-proclaiming that MGI is number one when it was far from the truth.
Nawat should have somebody by his side to remind him of his excesses or caution him to tone down his braggadocio. He should have brainstormed with his colleagues and staff and asked for their support - (a case in point is the organization's advocacy to stop the war and violence - as the team smooths the way that their mantra is feasible and attainable and helps ensure the change will be sustainable.
He should have also a lawyer on standby to advise him that if he is going down a path he or she can’t support; he can explain the pros and the cons. His colleague's support will shield him from retribution if things go awry. And if things don't look good, he doesn't have to take the blame all to himself.
His colleagues should also be included in designing and implementing the advocacy for example. He should actively solicit the thoughts of the group and listen respectfully regardless of rank and role. Areas of agreement and dissent should be openly discussed and considered. People are much more likely to buy into plans to which they contribute.
Finally, he should allow team members to see the problem and educate them about the implications if the problem is not resolved. If he is worried about damaging the culture, keep in mind that culture is not harmed by unpopular decisions: Culture is harmed when decisions are perceived to be unfair, unjust, or unnecessary.
People accept decisions that are detrimental to them if they believe the decision-making process to be fair and just. This is known as procedural justice. Organizations strong in procedural justice have healthier cultures and superior performance.
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment